Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A4349F94EE
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Sun,  4 Nov 2007 11:15:00 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 07857-10 for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Sun,  4 Nov 2007 11:14:38 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5
Received: from developer.pgadmin.org (developer.pgadmin.org [63.246.23.140])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB73D9F94D7
	for <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>; Sun,  4 Nov 2007 11:14:56 -0400 (AST)
Received: from [172.16.0.65] ([78.146.239.24]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by developer.pgadmin.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lA4FEjEV017603
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Sun, 4 Nov 2007 15:14:46 GMT
Message-ID: <472DE1F4.4010601@postgresql.org>
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 15:15:00 +0000
From: Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
CC: Kevin Hunter <hunteke@earlham.edu>,
	"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>,
	Chander Ganesan <chander@otg-nc.com>,
	Postgres WWW List <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>,
	Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: Training events policy ... first test case
References: <200711031703310000@114527600> <20071103142105.2d29bc1b@scratch>
	<472D02A3.1070404@postgresql.org> <20071103205146.63a6997c@scratch>
	<472D505C.8010009@earlham.edu> <5652.1194152441@sss.pgh.pa.us>
In-Reply-To: <5652.1194152441@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200711/95
X-Sequence-Number: 12873

Tom Lane wrote:
> Kevin Hunter <hunteke@earlham.edu> writes:
>> Or perhaps:
> 
>> In the next six months, there are <link>21 events</link> in 4 countries
>> from 13 different companies.
> 
> +1, especially if the number of companies is noticeably more than
> three-or-four.

Grr - the companies bit was the part that took all the time :-)

The way it is now, it will never name more than three companies, of 
which it will pull the names randomly from the upcoming events.

I think it's useful to keep the companies names there as it will give 
people more of an impression of the range of different training 
providers available. I'll play with the wording and layout later (maybe 
tomorrow) and see if I can address the general concern that it looks too 
'blocky'.

If that doesn't work, I'll back it off to just the count.

/D