-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Sunday, November 04, 2007 10:53:47 -0500 Chander Ganesan
<[email protected]> wrote:
I understand, however the issue now isn't one of growth...IMHO it's one of
growth being stymied because we have a list of training events that doesn't
represent classes *actually* being offered. Seems like at the very least a
short term "band aid" solution could be applied while we try to figure out a
way to adequately and fairly address the issue... I'm sure as time goes on
we'll come to better understand the needs of companies that legitimately
offer training courses.
How is this much different then universities / colleges that offer Course
timeslot X/Y and Z, but cancel slot Z because there wasn't enough enrollment to
make it worth doign?
I think the University has the intention of offering the class, they
also have an established and published rule in regard to the criteria
to offer the course, they have an instructor that is slated and
available to teach the class in advance, they have a facility that is
"reserved" in advance for the event, etc. I could go on and on.... In
our case, we've got companies that are using the training list for lead
generation, to sell PG related services and/or training. One such
company in question apparently lists themselves as a consulting company
that also offers PG training (refer to the PG services page).