Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8F09F9868 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 04:45:27 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 78000-02 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 04:45:23 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from developer.pgadmin.org (developer.pgadmin.org [63.246.23.140]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AAD39F9869 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 04:45:23 -0400 (AST) Received: from snake.edbuk ([62.232.55.118]) (authenticated bits=0) by developer.pgadmin.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lA58jBGQ003994 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Nov 2007 08:45:13 GMT Message-ID: <472ED818.8050404@postgresql.org> Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 08:45:12 +0000 From: Dave Page User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chander Ganesan CC: "Marc G. Fournier" , Kevin Hunter , "Joshua D. Drake" , Postgres WWW List , Peter Eisentraut Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: Training events policy ... first test case References: <200711031703310000@114527600> <20071103142105.2d29bc1b@scratch> <472D02A3.1070404@postgresql.org> <20071103205146.63a6997c@scratch> <472D505C.8010009@earlham.edu> <30F7311191EA4127FE35229B@ganymede.hub.org> <472D5E5F.8070703@otg-nc.com> <9599AD77F626EA5EFDBE4859@ganymede.hub.org> <472DE115.2050902@postgresql.org> <472DEC21.3040603@otg-nc.com> <472E4793.3010504@postgresql.org> <472E5CE3.9030900@otg-nc.com> In-Reply-To: <472E5CE3.9030900@otg-nc.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: url=http://www.pgadmin.org/pgp/davepage.pgp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200711/120 X-Sequence-Number: 12898 Chander Ganesan wrote: > Dave Page wrote: >> If we want to do something like that it needs to be done properly by >> (for example) pre-defining some set categories to ensure we list things >> appropriately. >> > We could fund the change...OTG is willing to foot the bill (assuming we > get an estimate of cost in advance) , or make a sizable SPI contribution > (say $1000?) . I agree this is the best way to go... That won't fix my own lack of time, but someone might be interested in taking a look. /D