Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FB0C2E009B for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:33:45 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 71371-03 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:33:38 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (sca-es-mail-2.Sun.COM [192.18.43.133]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8537D2E0348 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:33:37 -0300 (ADT) Received: from fe-sfbay-10.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m2AHXZQP026191 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:33:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-10.sun.com by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JXI00801ZBHB900@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com> (original mail from josh@agliodbs.com) for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:33:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from josh-berkuss-macbook.local ([64.81.245.111]) by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JXI00D5KZFZ1600@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com>; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:33:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:33:35 -0700 From: Josh Berkus Subject: Re: Contributor listing policy In-reply-to: <20080309190058.16386d40@commandprompt.com> To: "Joshua D. Drake" Cc: Tom Lane , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Message-id: <47D570EF.8090601@agliodbs.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <200803071514.09009.josh@agliodbs.com> <20080307175725.138404c6@commandprompt.com> <200803091211.58029.josh@agliodbs.com> <20080309141950.0a8071bc@commandprompt.com> <17085.1205110747@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20080309190058.16386d40@commandprompt.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200803/180 X-Sequence-Number: 14299 Josh, > Fair enough, I assume -hackers is not the place to have this > discussion. Should this be on -general? I don't think so -- General is mostly newbies seeking help, not contributors. Hackers would be the most applicable list, followed by this list (already taken care of) and Advocacy for non-code contributors. However, such a discussion is liable to take weeks. You need to ask yourself whether the changes you want are worth spending weeks sheperding an e-mail discussion, and then longer before the listings actually get updated. --Josh