Message-ID: <47D80B19.7000906@kaltenbrunner.cc>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:55:53 +0100
From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>
User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20080208)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
CC: Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>,
	Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>,
	Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>,
	PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Email not searchable in our archives
References: <200803112135.m2BLZ6625071@momjian.us>
	<20080312130902.GC4926@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<937d27e10803120714h21f1f661s657fad641f35c3d5@mail.gmail.com>
	<937d27e10803120825k67fc19c1h27f977a8038dfdd7@mail.gmail.com>
	<19584.1205336481@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<937d27e10803120904g3198fd51vd4a51a36e556eca7@mail.gmail.com>
	<20051.1205338017@sss.pgh.pa.us>
In-Reply-To: <20051.1205338017@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Dave Page" <dpage@pgadmin.org> writes:
>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> That would explain a contiguous range of messages that were not indexed,
>>> but is that what we have?
> 
>> Looking at the debug output, the messages that were missed were all contiguous:
> 
> OK, that seems to support your theory.  Might as well go ahead and
> reindex.  +1 for getting some monitoring in there somewhere.

yeah we will work on that and add some new ones to our current list of 
354 active checks ;-)


Stefan