Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B0212E003F for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:50:09 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18642-03 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:50:07 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from cronos.madness.at (madness.at [217.196.146.217]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5252E003C for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:50:06 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mastermind.kaltenbrunner.cc ([83.215.233.60]) by cronos.madness.at with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Jdpry-0003mB-1I; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:50:01 +0100 Message-ID: <47E7DC82.3020706@kaltenbrunner.cc> Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:53:22 +0100 From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Momjian CC: "Marc G. Fournier" , "Joshua D. Drake" , PostgreSQL www Subject: Re: New email list for emergency communications References: <200803241547.m2OFlKu15415@momjian.us> In-Reply-To: <200803241547.m2OFlKu15415@momjian.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200803/547 X-Sequence-Number: 14666 Bruce Momjian wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: >>> I would like the requirements defined by the -www and sysadmins teams. >>> I don't want us to go off and create yet more infrastructure without >>> full documentation and understanding of the purpose and whether it is >>> redundant. >>> >>> This list is currently redundant as we have the resources and >>> technology already in place to deal with this. I think you are >>> attacking the wrong problem Bruce. >> For how often it happens, its worth nothing: I agree 100% with Joshua >> here, but, if Bruce wants to create a list on his personal domain (which, >> in itself is a failure point as it requires that *his* domain is not 100% >> perfect), it doesn't mean that anyone actually has to *use* it ... I know >> I never will, since there already exist faster, more reliable, contact >> methods ... > > I think we need a more centralized contact system than we have now. > Personally when I don't get email I am unsure who to contact (because > community email is down). The email list was a method to centralize > that. The list of possible contact methods listed confirms my point. the sysadmin team already maintains a list of emergency contacts including external email, phone numbers, alternative contacts in addition to the what we are usually using to communicate (IM,personal email, the lists) - not sure if we need to duplicate that ... Stefan