Message-ID: <47E92CBF.1000107@dunslane.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 12:47:59 -0400
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
	rv:1.8.0.12) Gecko/20071019 Fedora/1.0.9-3.fc6 pango-text
	SeaMonkey/1.0.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
CC: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>,
  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] New email list for emergency communications
References: <47E7F825.9020902@kaltenbrunner.cc>
	<200803241909.m2OJ9RX08326@momjian.us>
	<20080324192014.GI5484@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<47E82D9D.6040000@dunslane.net>
	<20080325145735.GB28405@crankycanuck.ca>
	<21700.1206460234@sss.pgh.pa.us>
In-Reply-To: <21700.1206460234@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca> writes:
>   
>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 06:39:25PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>     
>>> perusing a mailbox again. We have unfortunately been badly underprepared 
>>> for this.
>>>       
>
>   
>> Surely that there is an emerging consensus to that effect means that it's
>> not as unfortunate as it might be?  I seem to recall the original
>> announcement suggesting this was an experiment.  I wouldn't expect the first
>> couple rounds to go without a hitch; as long as there is procedural
>> improvement the next time, that's a good thing, right?
>>     
>
> Yeah, we expected to have glitches.  I think we now have a much better
> idea what sort of status-tracking support we need for future fests.
>
> 			
>   

Yes. I'm not meaning to whine, sorry if it comes over like that. It 
looks to me like we need a sort of prep phase for a commit-fest, so the 
people switching into commit-fest mode when it starts can do so with 
little friction.

cheers

andrew