Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE592E004B for ; Wed, 7 May 2008 12:17:18 -0300 (ADT) Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29730-03 for ; Wed, 7 May 2008 12:17:13 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: delayed 00:19:57.76685 by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from smtp145.sat.emailsrvr.com (smtp145.sat.emailsrvr.com [66.216.121.145]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FACD2E0047 for ; Wed, 7 May 2008 12:17:12 -0300 (ADT) Received: from relay4.relay.sat.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay4.relay.sat.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 5681D24C641; Wed, 7 May 2008 10:57:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: by relay4.relay.sat.mlsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: matthew-AT-zeut.net) with ESMTP id DD4B524BC05; Wed, 7 May 2008 10:57:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4821C34E.8090209@zeut.net> Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 10:57:18 -0400 From: "Matthew T. O'connor" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alex Hunsaker CC: Bruce Momjian , Brendan Jurd , Tom Lane , PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists References: <37ed240d0805070725oa5778b1q9ed77349fdcc24f4@mail.gmail.com> <200805071428.m47ESdI04278@momjian.us> <34d269d40805070752g4d578a1fu6acb00fd8e5f774e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <34d269d40805070752g4d578a1fu6acb00fd8e5f774e@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200805/174 X-Sequence-Number: 118173 Alex Hunsaker wrote: > In fact I > would argue -patches should go away so we dont have that split. +1 I think the main argument for the split is to keep the "large" patch emails off the hackers list, but I don't think that limit is so high that it's a problem. People have to gzip their patches to the patches list fairly often anyway.