Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABED02E0084 for ; Sat, 10 May 2008 05:19:16 -0300 (ADT) Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 54905-03 for ; Sat, 10 May 2008 05:19:07 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com (gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com [192.18.6.21]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538752E002C for ; Sat, 10 May 2008 05:19:10 -0300 (ADT) Received: from fe-emea-09.sun.com (gmp-eb-lb-2-fe3.eu.sun.com [192.18.6.12]) by gmp-eb-inf-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m4A8IwQe002876 for ; Sat, 10 May 2008 08:19:08 GMT Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-emea-09.sun.com by fe-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K0N00I018ENLT00@fe-emea-09.sun.com> (original mail from Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM) for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 10 May 2008 09:18:58 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.2.4] ([89.103.93.253]) by fe-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K0N000938FL4ZC0@fe-emea-09.sun.com>; Sat, 10 May 2008 09:18:58 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 10:16:56 +0200 From: Zdenek Kotala Subject: Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists In-reply-to: <87zlr0mqn9.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> To: Gregory Stark Cc: Josh Berkus , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Message-id: <482559F8.7020206@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <34d269d40805070752g4d578a1fu6acb00fd8e5f774e@mail.gmail.com> <34d269d40805070837q19f1144eu8c316fa1cf6d8780@mail.gmail.com> <4821D0A0.8040305@zeut.net> <200805081043.54942.josh@agliodbs.com> <87zlr0mqn9.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080325) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200805/289 X-Sequence-Number: 118288 Gregory Stark napsal(a): > "Josh Berkus" writes: > >> How about hacking together a simple patch tracker instead, as Bruce suggested? >> I've never found e-mail to be a particularly good way to track patches. > > The thing is that we don't just want to "track" patches. We want to talk about > patches. I think we want to have both. If you have big patch you don't want go through all patch again and again when new version is released with only few changes. If you are able to have diff between two patch versions you are able preform easy check if all comments are already fixed. Zdenek