Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AACED65059A for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:29:56 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 45280-02 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:29:45 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-159.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.159]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 902A66506A6 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:26:07 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.226] (or-69-34-217-90.sta.embarqhsd.net [69.34.217.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6S0SZc9032408 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 27 Jul 2008 17:28:38 -0700 Message-ID: <488D1223.3080802@commandprompt.com> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 17:26:11 -0700 From: "Joshua D. Drake" Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alvaro Herrera CC: Tom Lane , Andrew Sullivan , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Insecure DNS servers on PG infrastructure References: <26210.1216998123@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20080725154048.GE29775@commandprompt.com> <572.1217018672@sss.pgh.pa.us> <488CBFB6.6000207@commandprompt.com> <16605.1217184746@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20080727234657.GB8636@alvh.no-ip.org> In-Reply-To: <20080727234657.GB8636@alvh.no-ip.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (lists.commandprompt.com [207.173.203.159]); Sun, 27 Jul 2008 17:28:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200807/140 X-Sequence-Number: 15570 Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> "Joshua D. Drake" writes: >>> Tom can you check if this has been resolved? If not I am going to start >>> paging people. >> The machines I have access to (cvs and svr1) are still unpatched >> according to the "dig porttest" test. Personally, though, I'd be >> more interested in getting someone to work on fixing the mailing >> lists. I've received nothing since about midnight EDT, and I know >> that there has been traffic. > > Maybe the mail servers have been DDoS'ed again? I did have a bunch of alerts throw recovery around 2:00am but then where is all the traffic? >