Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7E764FD31 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 04:40:15 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31371-05 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 04:40:09 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A8A64FD23 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 04:40:09 -0300 (ADT) Received: from dynamic.hagander.net ([127.0.0.1]) (encrypted and authenticated) by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E58FDCC620; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 09:40:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mha-laptop.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0DA312485E; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 09:40:06 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <48995556.7030306@hagander.net> Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 09:40:06 +0200 From: Magnus Hagander User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Page CC: Richard Broersma , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Pug mailing list archive trucated References: <396486430808052134v3126f04dk159585115f1b39b1@mail.gmail.com> <937d27e10808060020y5d3874e4x88f65ce96107165a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <937d27e10808060020y5d3874e4x88f65ce96107165a@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200808/11 X-Sequence-Number: 15601 Dave Page wrote: > On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 5:34 AM, Richard Broersma > wrote: >> Since the "Baltimore/Washington DC" hyperlink was added to the left >> pane on the web page, all of the archived mail is partially left >> truncated from being viewed ( at least when viewed with IE7). >> >> Here is an example. >> >> >> http://archives.postgresql.org/lapug/2008-08/msg00000.php > > Yeuch - that really does screw up IE. Any objection to Baltimore/DC? Go for it. Should be obvious enough to anybody from the region (e.g. the US), and those are the interested parties after all :-) //Magnus