Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09ED764FD63 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2008 12:55:08 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81581-01-6 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2008 12:54:55 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from smtp118.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp118.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.118]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E362365035E for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2008 12:54:26 -0300 (ADT) Received: from relay1.r1.iad.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay1.r1.iad.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id BA7EA44C00C; Mon, 1 Sep 2008 11:54:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: by relay1.r1.iad.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: chander-AT-otg-nc.com) with ESMTP id E8AC244C004; Mon, 1 Sep 2008 11:54:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <48BC102F.3000105@otg-nc.com> Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 11:54:23 -0400 From: Chander Ganesan User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alvaro Herrera CC: Dave Page , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Download links References: <937d27e10808110203l790a9c3eud97fdde42f70b92f@mail.gmail.com> <48B85DCF.8070206@gmail.com> <20080829211052.GM3983@alvh.no-ip.org> In-Reply-To: <20080829211052.GM3983@alvh.no-ip.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200809/1 X-Sequence-Number: 15710 Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> I had to spend a bit of time hunting around to find the latest release >> of 8.2.x, in fact, it's not really "indicated" anywhere that "old" >> versions are there. Looking at the /download page, I cannot find a >> single reference to older versions (the big advantage to the old >> format). One has to hunt around until they find the "source code" link >> to locate an older version of postgresql. >> > > There's no usefulness whatsoever to the old versions, so why should they > be linked to? > > There are many organizations that have PostgreSQL's older versions deployed, and have yet to upgrade to the latest major release...but still have need to download the latest patch release to upgrade their installation. IMHO, for this reason the older versions are extremely important. Hence the need to link to them. All I'm saying is that there is a major decrease in usability of the site when it's not clearly documented where someone can get the latest patch version for their release. -- Chander Ganesan Open Technology Group, Inc. One Copley Parkway, Suite 210 Morrisville, NC 27560 919-463-0999/877-258-8987 http://www.otg-nc.com