Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4587B64FC9D
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:24:39 -0400 (AST)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 53050-02 for
	<pgsql-www-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:24:33 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A922A64FC32
	for <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:24:33 -0400 (AST)
Received: from dynamic.hagander.net ([127.0.0.1]) (encrypted and
	authenticated) by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id
	2F23ADCC389; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:24:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mha-laptop.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D23124117;
	Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:24:31 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <494FBF3F.8080103@hagander.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:24:31 +0100
From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081125)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
CC: w^3 <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Subject: Re: publishing changelogs on pgweb
References: <200707111306.l6BD69G14356@momjian.us>
	<25050.1184164913@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20081222122811.GA10220@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<494F8B64.2020504@hagander.net>
In-Reply-To: <494F8B64.2020504@hagander.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200812/144
X-Sequence-Number: 16321

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Seems doable, at least in theory :)

I've cleaned up my script a bit and am running some further tests now.
It does seem to work pretty well. But:

>>> BTW, cvs2cl (at least the version I use) works fine against a remote
>>> repository, so it's not like Ray couldn't have gotten the answer for
>>> himself.  But a web page would be more user-friendly.

What version is this? Mine seems to need a local checkout to work at all...

//Magnus