public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
To: Greg Stark <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Function C and INOUT parameters
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:03:15 -0700
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>


> Personally I'm of the opinion we should eliminate most of these
> duplicative mailing lists like -performance and -interfaces and just
> use -general. I don't see that having multiple lists for user
> questions helps either the users or the answerers due to just this
> type of problem.

... and instead drive new users away by forcing them to sign up for one 
massive 400 posts/day list?

I'm not sure about -interfaces, but -performance, -sql, -jdbc and others 
definitely have specific audiences and themes which they are already 
handling a *lot* of traffic for.

--Josh

view thread (16+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Function C and INOUT parameters
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox