Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1F1636169 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:37:03 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26080-07 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:36:56 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D342634155 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:36:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: from dynamic.hagander.net ([127.0.0.1]) (encrypted and authenticated) by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB2C7DCC558; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 19:36:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mha-laptop.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23F58124112; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 19:36:56 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <49E76CB7.3070103@hagander.net> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 19:36:55 +0200 From: Magnus Hagander User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" CC: Alvaro Herrera , Dave Page , Bruce Momjian , Tom Lane , PostgreSQL www Subject: Re: Archives policy References: <16454.1239890476@sss.pgh.pa.us> <200904161454.n3GEsxm27869@momjian.us> <937d27e10904160808w21a2ebbcs57136807df000680@mail.gmail.com> <20090416151427.GW7709@alvh.no-ip.org> <20090416134825.Y84471@hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20090416134825.Y84471@hub.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.068 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=0.068 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200904/84 X-Sequence-Number: 16951 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >> Dave Page wrote: >> >>> OK, well I've removed the bit about removing illegal/unwanted >>> material. FWIW, we *will* remove such unwanted content, otherwise we >>> could easily become an online archive for pr0n/warez etc. which will >>> certainly not do our reputation any good. >> >> Now that you've hashed that out, would you explain *how* would you >> actually remove the posts? It requires editing the majordomo archive >> store, but I don't think many people has access to that ... I know I >> don't for one (and I keep wondering why, seeing how I am the de facto >> archives maintainer). > > All list owners can delete messagse from their archives ... its built > into Mj2: Oh crap. Can we remove that ability? Since we *know* it breaks the archives... //Magnus