Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1285E632C61; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:39:31 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 87758-02; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:39:23 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7800632AAC; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:39:24 -0300 (ADT) Received: from dynamic.hagander.net ([127.0.0.1]) (encrypted and authenticated) by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D145DCD306; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:39:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mha-laptop.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC32C12426E; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:39:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <49EB53BA.2020004@hagander.net> Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:39:22 +0200 From: Magnus Hagander User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rainer Bauer CC: PostgreSQL www , Postgres General Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Community account References: <49EAE96D.8070904@hagander.net> <1005410001.20090419124758@munnin.com> In-Reply-To: <1005410001.20090419124758@munnin.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.078 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=0.078 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200904/101 X-Sequence-Number: 16968 Rainer Bauer wrote: > Hello Magnus, > > Sunday, April 19, 2009, 11:05:49 AM, you wrote: > > MH> You need to have the email system give us at least a chance to get off > MH> the graylist :-) Or you need to whitelist the wwwmaster.postgresql.org > MH> domain. > > It was whitelisted and works now like a charm. Thanks, Magnus! > > I suppose there is no way to display an error message to the user if > the email cannot be delivered? Not really. We deliver the email to the mailserver - at that point it leaves the control of the application. It *can* be done, but that would take a lot of more work - we'd basically have to implement our own mailserver functionality... //Magnus