public inbox for [email protected]help / color / mirror / Atom feed
FW: Undeliverable:Re: [PERFORM] Auto performance tuning? 2+ messages / 2 participants [nested] [flat]
* FW: Undeliverable:Re: [PERFORM] Auto performance tuning? @ 2006-03-21 14:50 Jim Nasby <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Jim Nasby @ 2006-03-21 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pgsql-www Arg, someone want to gank this email from the lists please? And shouldn't majordomo detect these bounces anyway? -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] on behalf of Jim Nasby Sent: Tue 3/21/2006 5:35 AM To: Orion Henry Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Auto performance tuning? Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Auto performance tuning? Sent: 3/21/2006 5:35 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: [email protected] on 3/21/2006 7:54 AM The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator. < fastmail.fm #5.0.0 X-Postfix; <jhaile>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table> ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: FW: Undeliverable:Re: [PERFORM] Auto performance @ 2006-03-21 17:47 Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]> parent: Jim Nasby <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Marc G. Fournier @ 2006-03-21 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jim Nasby <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Jim Nasby wrote: > Arg, someone want to gank this email from the lists please? And > shouldn't majordomo detect these bounces anyway? Yanked, and not if it was a CC address ... > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] on behalf of Jim Nasby > Sent: Tue 3/21/2006 5:35 AM > To: Orion Henry > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Auto performance tuning? > > > Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. > > Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Auto performance tuning? > Sent: 3/21/2006 5:35 AM > > The following recipient(s) could not be reached: > > [email protected] on 3/21/2006 7:54 AM > The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator. > < fastmail.fm #5.0.0 X-Postfix; <jhaile>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table> > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to > choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not > match > ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: [email protected] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-03-21 17:47 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2006-03-21 14:50 FW: Undeliverable:Re: [PERFORM] Auto performance tuning? Jim Nasby <[email protected]> 2006-03-21 17:47 ` Re: FW: Undeliverable:Re: [PERFORM] Auto performance Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox