Received: from magus.postgresql.org (magus.postgresql.org [87.238.57.229]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D055197AB87 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:05:32 -0400 (AST) Received: from smtp.01.com ([199.36.142.181]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rrvbd-0004qx-NQ for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:05:31 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-out-2.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09CEA4F4702 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:05:17 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp-out-2.01.com Received: from smtp.01.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp-out-2.01.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UNb28TYZ8ZDV for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:05:16 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-out-2.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D99C24F472A for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:05:16 -0600 (CST) Received: from Sidney-Stratton.local (70-36-143-92.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [70.36.143.92]) by smtp-out-2.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8389F4F46E4; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:05:16 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <4F26DBDD.60104@agliodbs.com> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:05:17 -0800 From: Josh Berkus Organization: PostgreSQL Experts Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111103 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Magnus Hagander CC: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Planet posting policy References: <96e5156e36277877d18484a5148ad516@biglumber.com> <4F26DA5D.7040808@agliodbs.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Archive-Number: 201201/79 X-Sequence-Number: 20477 Magnus, > Did you read the example? It *was* basically a press release... Not from my perspective. Dave's post tells me in factual language exactly what the features of PEM are (or are intended to be), sufficient to let me know if I should investigate PEM for my customers and PUG or not. And if you compare it to the EDB press release on the same topic, you'll note some dramatic content and style differences. Based on the EDB press release, I'd dismissed PEM as yet more EDB vaporware until I got to pgOpen. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com