Received: from magus.postgresql.org (magus.postgresql.org [87.238.57.229]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CEDD1288B2F for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 14:08:15 -0400 (AST) Received: from 30.55.colo.spiretech.net ([69.168.55.30] helo=lists.commandprompt.com) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsebL-0006zW-DS for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:08:14 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.5] (spinlock.commandprompt.com [69.168.55.30]) by lists.commandprompt.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8751B108; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:08:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.5] ([68.118.161.194] helo=[192.168.1.5]) by assp.commandprompt.com with ESMTPS(AES256-SHA) (2.1.1); 1 Feb 2012 10:08:24 -0800 Message-ID: <4F297F6C.7050007@commandprompt.com> Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:07:40 -0800 From: "Joshua D. Drake" Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111124 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Page CC: Magnus Hagander , Josh Berkus , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Planet posting policy References: <96e5156e36277877d18484a5148ad516@biglumber.com> <4F26DA5D.7040808@agliodbs.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Assp-Version: 2.1.1(11364) on assp.commandprompt.com X-Assp-Client-SSL: yes X-Assp-ID: assp.commandprompt.com m1-19704-06677 X-Assp-Envelope-From: jd@commandprompt.com X-Assp-Intended-For: dpage@pgadmin.org X-Assp-Original-Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Planet posting policy X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Archive-Number: 201202/6 X-Sequence-Number: 20489 On 02/01/2012 08:43 AM, Dave Page wrote: >> The only technical solution I see to that that seems reasonably easy >> to build would be to have those who want to post these more commercial >> posts on their blog register for a special "permission" to do that, >> and that those posts ends up being moderated in the same way we >> moderate news today. That might work reasonably well, but it's >> certainly a more complex process... > > Yeah. But that's also drifting off-topic slightly - the question in > debate here is "do we want to relax the rules", which a number of > people have been in favour of, and only one against if I'm counting > correctly, and if so, how do we do so without going too far in the > other direction? We only really need a moderation system if people > don't follow the guidelines. > A poll will be mostly useless. It is going to only get responses from those who: A. Care about polls B. Read the poll section C. Are directly .Org people (versus remotely) The question to me really boils down to, do we want to relax the rules in an order to increase readership and the value (intellectual) of the content. As long as the rules are as they are, we are limiting the advocacy power of Planet. Maybe that is what we want, maybe not but as Dave has said, most are in favor of relaxing the rules. JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ @cmdpromptinc - @postgresconf - 509-416-6579