Received: from magus.postgresql.org (magus.postgresql.org [87.238.57.229]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26EFE1F95019 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 00:15:38 -0400 (AST) Received: from smtp.01.com ([199.36.142.181]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rso58-0000yR-Vu for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 04:15:37 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-out-1.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8B43F4CF2 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 22:15:21 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp-out-1.01.com Received: from smtp.01.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp-out-1.01.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LGLve7OvlkGX for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 22:15:21 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-out-1.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066273F4D23 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 22:15:21 -0600 (CST) Received: from Sidney-Stratton.local (c-71-57-133-62.hsd1.fl.comcast.net [71.57.133.62]) by smtp-out-1.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9D3D73F4CF2; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 22:15:20 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <4F2A0DD2.7020400@agliodbs.com> Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:15:14 -0500 From: Josh Berkus Organization: PostgreSQL Experts Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111103 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Magnus Hagander CC: Dave Page , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Planet posting policy References: <96e5156e36277877d18484a5148ad516@biglumber.com> <4F26DA5D.7040808@agliodbs.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Archive-Number: 201202/15 X-Sequence-Number: 20498 On 2/1/12 11:27 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Agreed. Which is why it's interesting that those posting in favor of > allowing more "commercially oriented" posts are the people who either > have commercial products they'd consider blogging about or have > previous been asked to remove at least one post from the planet... At > least AFAICT, forgive me if I got one wrong or so, but the majority is > certainly that way... Yes, although I'll point out that the post I got removed was one which would still be prohibited under my suggested new policy. Personally, I really do think two feeds is the only answer ... -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com