Received: from magus.postgresql.org (magus.postgresql.org [87.238.57.229]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA9581BD29 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:22:10 -0300 (ADT) Received: from 30.55.colo.spiretech.net ([69.168.55.30] helo=lists.commandprompt.com) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SKFqZ-0000g4-1R for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:22:07 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.5] (spinlock.commandprompt.com [69.168.55.30]) by lists.commandprompt.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E7BC382; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:21:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.5] ([68.118.161.194] helo=[192.168.1.5]) by assp.commandprompt.com with ESMTPS(AES256-SHA) (2.1.1); 17 Apr 2012 14:21:52 -0700 Message-ID: <4F8DDED8.1070208@commandprompt.com> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:21:28 -0700 From: "Joshua D. Drake" Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120410 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Smith CC: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Planet posting policy References: <96e5156e36277877d18484a5148ad516@biglumber.com> <4F8CF64C.5050403@2ndQuadrant.com> <4F8DDA0E.8030108@2ndQuadrant.com> In-Reply-To: <4F8DDA0E.8030108@2ndQuadrant.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Assp-Version: 2.1.1(11364) on assp.commandprompt.com X-Assp-Client-SSL: yes X-Assp-ID: assp.commandprompt.com m1-97712-09490 X-Assp-Envelope-From: jd@commandprompt.com X-Assp-Intended-For: greg@2ndQuadrant.com X-Assp-Original-Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Planet posting policy X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Archive-Number: 201204/27 X-Sequence-Number: 20601 On 04/17/2012 02:01 PM, Greg Smith wrote: > > On 04/17/2012 04:10 AM, Dave Page wrote: >> It's interesting that you think that's possible. I've thus far refused >> requests from our marketing department to do exactly at as I thought >> it would certainly be a violation of the policy. I'm not convinced it >> wouldn't be even now, but it's interesting to know you might find >> something acceptable. > > I would think this format would work: > > -What things do people like to monitor/manage on their Postgres database? > -Quick intro to what the free tools can do [pgAdmin III, Munin, etc.] > -Discussion of the things that PEM provides > > If people walk away having learned something about monitoring and tools > for PostgreSQL in general, I'd consider that a useful article meeting > the standard I suggested here--"information provided would be of some > use even to people who have no interest in the commercial product > mentioned"--even if it ended with a discussion of how PEM aims to solve > those problems. > As would I. JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ @cmdpromptinc - @postgresconf - 509-416-6579