Received: from magus.postgresql.org (magus.postgresql.org [87.238.57.229])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661AA17A3628
	for <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 17:47:04 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from smtp.01.com ([199.36.142.181])
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <josh@agliodbs.com>) id 1Sp3oL-00058I-HC
	for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 20:47:03 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp-out-2.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8B3390172;
	Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:46:47 -0500 (CDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp-out-2.01.com
Received: from smtp.01.com ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (smtp-out-2.01.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id Oep0V-pvgl6W; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:46:47 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from smtp.01.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp-out-2.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4EA3901E2;
	Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:46:47 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from Sidney-Stratton.local (70-36-143-92.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net
	[70.36.143.92])
	by smtp-out-2.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD1143901D2;
	Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:46:46 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <4FFDE636.7010003@agliodbs.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 13:46:46 -0700
From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Organization: PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6;
	rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
CC: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>,
	Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>,
	Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>,
	Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>,
	Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, w^3 <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: 9.2beta web issues
References: 
 <CABUevEybVA7dEeBUekoinBpLn40jWjhYHdhzPJj=f-p1ZYPRgg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1341525030-sup-6100@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<2405.1341528250@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4FF72D24.1010206@kaltenbrunner.cc>
	<CAEYLb_Uycpj6h1f5_1dXquk1c2XOVeSYDaPtKHHWibQbOpXD8w@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FFB67BD.90908@agliodbs.com> <4FFC6AA0.1060903@kaltenbrunner.cc>
	<4FFC6C8E.2060305@agliodbs.com>
	<1341943550-sup-2118@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<4FFC7124.3050700@agliodbs.com> <20120710182957.GB31912@momjian.us>
	<4FFC764B.4060800@kaltenbrunner.cc> <5265.1341951306@sss.pgh.pa.us>
In-Reply-To: <5265.1341951306@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-Archive-Number: 201207/86
X-Sequence-Number: 20835


> +1.  Adding a mailing list is not exactly the hardest part of getting
> a formal QA effort going.  Moreover, if the previous rationale for having
> pgsql-testing was that it was a place where newbies could feel sheltered
> while posting bug reports, how are the existing subscribers going to
> relate to what Josh is now suggesting?  Repurposing this list for that
> usage seems entirely inappropriate.

Well, the ones who've spoken up would be fine with it.  But I'm not sure
how many people are on now.

If we kill the list, though, I'll be directing people to submit
*successful* test reports (i.e. "this worked") to pgsql-bugs.  Please
make sure that's what you want.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com