X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB06D1B49A for ; Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:20 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 40297-06 for ; Tue, 25 May 2004 18:46:57 -0300 (ADT) Received: from anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.89]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59BC5D1DFAD for ; Tue, 25 May 2004 18:38:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mailgate2.vale-housing.co.uk ([80.176.1.147] helo=vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BSjd9-000EZ6-0V; Tue, 25 May 2004 22:38:39 +0100 Received: from tartanic.demon.co.uk ([80.177.99.193]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user dpage) by ssl.vale-housing.co.uk with HTTP; Tue, 25 May 2004 22:38:39 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <50049.80.177.99.193.1085521119.squirrel@ssl.vale-housing.co.uk> Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 22:38:39 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: New News Entry From: "Dave Page" To: In-Reply-To: <200405251111.48657.josh@agliodbs.com> References: <20040525101131.B8F4FCF4D42@www.postgresql.com> <200405252002.53673.peter_e@gmx.net> <200405251111.48657.josh@agliodbs.com> X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Cc: X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.6) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200405/111 X-Sequence-Number: 4490 It's rumoured that Josh Berkus once said: > Folks, > >> > Computer Associates announced its intention to open source Ingres on >> > May 24, 2004 at caworld 2004 in Las Vegas. >> >> This isn't PostgreSQL news. > > I'd have to agree with Peter, here. If someone (Bruce?) wants to do a > capsule history about the relationship between the two databases, then > fine ... but as is it's just stumping for CA. Agreed. Any thoughts on the eva/3 one (the one we got 8 copies of). It runs with PostgreSQL as well as a number of other DBs and is free for personal use but not commercial. I'm kinda on the fence on this one - on one hand it's another commercial app recognising and supporting PostgreSQL, on the other, well, it's a commercial app. Regards, Dave.