X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9F39ED1D26F; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 08:39:06 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 84584-04; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 04:38:51 -0400 (AST)
Received: from anchor-post-37.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-36.mail.demon.net
	[194.217.242.86]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D8045D1E324; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 04:38:36 -0400 (AST)
Received: from mailgate2.vale-housing.co.uk ([80.176.1.147]
	helo=vale-housing.co.uk)
	by anchor-post-37.mail.demon.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
	id 1AwzzZ-000KXp-0b; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 08:38:37 +0000
Received: from tartanic.demon.co.uk ([80.177.99.193])
	(SquirrelMail authenticated user dpage)
	by ssl.vale-housing.co.uk with HTTP;
	Sat, 28 Feb 2004 08:38:37 -0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <50118.80.177.99.193.1077957517.squirrel@ssl.vale-housing.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 08:38:37 -0000 (GMT)
Subject: Re: Upgraded Site..any news ?
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: <scrappy@postgresql.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040227145701.N82441@ganymede.hub.org>
References: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F4B0@mail.vale-housing.co.uk>
	<200402261437.42449.josh@agliodbs.com>
	<20040227145701.N82441@ganymede.hub.org>
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Cc: <josh@agliodbs.com>, <geeks@dotgeek.org>, <borz_off@cs.msu.su>,
	<pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.6)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200402/235
X-Sequence-Number: 3800

It's rumoured that Marc G. Fournier once said:
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>> Dave,
>>
>> > We don't own it. PostgreSQL Inc. do (which does make me wonder why
>> > we link directly to it from every page).
>>
>> Well, in theory, they run it for our benefit.   We're supposed to get
>> 20% of each sale.
>
> Which, for almost the past year, have been close to zero ... David is
> right, in that the site just plain sucks ... I'm a programmer, and it
> definitely :(
>
> David, if you want to propose a new front end to it, I know I'd
> definitely not argue against it ... :)

What's wrong with the Cafe Press one? The only issue we had there iirc, is
that one of us didn't like the font on some of the merchandise <grin>
/D