X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E4AFD1B463 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 18:08:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59734-04 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:07:35 -0400 (AST) Received: from anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.85]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A199FD1B439 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:07:33 -0400 (AST) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([80.176.1.146] helo=salem.vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1AX2Yb-0009aF-0Z; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 18:07:29 +0000 Received: from vale-housing.co.uk ([192.168.1.89] RDNS failed) by salem.vale-housing.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 18 Dec 2003 18:07:29 +0000 Received: from tartanic.demon.co.uk ([80.177.99.193]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user dpage) by ssl.vale-housing.co.uk with HTTP; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 18:07:29 -0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <50237.80.177.99.193.1071770849.squirrel@ssl.vale-housing.co.uk> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 18:07:29 -0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: Hello and some questions From: "Dave Page" To: In-Reply-To: <200312180914.22225.josh@agliodbs.com> References: <3FDE28DA.5070902@ehpg.net> <200312170932.12732.josh@agliodbs.com> <1071696289.8947.8626.camel@camel> <200312180914.22225.josh@agliodbs.com> X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Cc: , , X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.6) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Dec 2003 18:07:29.0574 (UTC) FILETIME=[CCF05C60:01C3C591] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200312/127 X-Sequence-Number: 3187 It's rumoured that Josh Berkus once said: > Robert, > >> Like maintaining the list of hosting providers? Or the list of support >> companies? Or researching and updating missing/broken articles? Or >> adding new articles and links? Maybe those types of things aren't sexy >> enough for you though? > > I didn't know that you were doing that ... it's not really visible from > the main page, and I've not been getting any of the e-mail. So, by > the principles of Volunteerocracy, you are now in charge. Most of the mail goes to the webmaster address, and is handled by Robert and I (depending on it's content). Robert has undertaken that role and the maintenance of techdocs since Justin stepped down. That takeover was certainly discussed on the lists, but granted that was before we archived it. > She's been led to believe, by some former members of our community, > that there is some kind of secret cabal running our Web presence and > that she is not welcome. I assume 'some former members' is actually 'one former member'? By all means, she is welcome to join the party - tell her to subscribe to the list and CC me so I know she's done it and I'll approve her request. > I've been working on disabusing her of that > notion. Offering to put her "in charge" of Techdocs seemed like a > good move in that regard. That is definately a community decision to make. Regards, Dave.