X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA64D1B562 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 19:33:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 95629-01 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:33:43 -0400 (AST) Received: from anchor-post-37.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-36.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.86]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F79D1DB35 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:33:41 -0400 (AST) Received: from mailgate2.vale-housing.co.uk ([80.176.1.147] helo=vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-37.mail.demon.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1B0QVR-000DME-0b; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 19:33:41 +0000 Received: from tartanic.demon.co.uk ([80.177.99.193]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user dpage) by ssl.vale-housing.co.uk with HTTP; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 19:33:41 -0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <50252.80.177.99.193.1078774421.squirrel@ssl.vale-housing.co.uk> Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 19:33:41 -0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: Archives Search Broken From: "Dave Page" To: In-Reply-To: <1078772755.2784.211.camel@camel> References: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F5BA@mail.vale-housing.co.uk> <200403080832.42105.josh@agliodbs.com> <1078772755.2784.211.camel@camel> X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Cc: , X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.6) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200403/62 X-Sequence-Number: 3878 It's rumoured that Robert Treat once said: > On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 11:32, Josh Berkus wrote: >> Dave, >> >> > Though strangely it now seems to work... >> >> I still get nothing. I've tried on both Konqueror & Firefox in case >> it's a browser issue. Odd thing is, the search returns in about 0.5 >> seconds ... which is *awfully* fast considering I'm on wireless. >> It's like it's not even running a search, just immediately returning >> "no results". >> >> AHA! Found the problem, I think. I was assuming that "in the last >> month" meant "in the last 30 days". I think ASPSeek interprets "in >> the last month" to mean *this* month, i.e. March. This would >> explain the results I'm getting for several queries. Nah, that's not it I don't think. It looks more to me like it's not picking up newer posts - even if u pick last 3 months the newest it finds is January. I'll take a look tomorrow. Regards, Dave.