X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81BEF32A4E5 for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 03:10:25 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 37332-05 for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 02:10:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rodrick.geeknet.com.au (ns1.geeknet.com.au [220.244.63.182]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403A932A4F1 for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 03:10:12 +0100 (BST) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Problem with mirrorring X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0 Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 12:10:04 +1000 Message-ID: <5066E5A966339E42AA04BA10BA706AE561C8@rodrick.geeknet.com.au> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Problem with mirrorring Thread-Index: AcSotQV0TK7xQieeRaS3d6HdK6we0AAAwVewAA1msAA= From: "John Hansen" To: "Dave Page" , "Devrim GUNDUZ" Cc: "PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200410/30 X-Sequence-Number: 5424 Ahemm,...=20 > >=20 > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-www/2004-09/msg00149.php > > and your reply: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-www/2004-09/msg00152.php > >=20 > > There was not an 'error' exactly... >=20 > Ahh, yes. Of course, that's actually rsync working correctly!=20 > No changes on the server, so no transfers. >=20 > This does mean that our mirroring is quite innefficient. We=20 > really should diff the results of each build and only update=20 > the html files if there is a change. At the moment each=20 > mirror is probably pulling the whole site each time :-( Don't you mean quite efficient... ? I assume the email devrim receives is a list of files changed. Rsync will do a diff on the files and copy the changes across. If however the only difference is the timestamp, then the file=20 will still be listed in said email, since it's timestamp was updated. I hope this weeds out any confusion. ... John