Message-ID: <5115388A.4040007@agliodbs.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 09:40:26 -0800
From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Organization: PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
CC: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>,
	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs
References: <5112C602.3090109@agliodbs.com> <511513E5.10104@gmx.net>
	<16562.1360339107@sss.pgh.pa.us>
In-Reply-To: <16562.1360339107@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org

On 02/08/2013 07:58 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> I suggest, build it and they will come, or not.  Let people push their
>> patches into Gerrit and attach the reviews to the commit fest items.  If
>> reviewers then want to use that, it's their choice.  We'll see how it goes.
> 
> I might be misunderstanding what you're suggesting here, but it sounds
> like this would imply that reviews could end up off in a Gerrit repo
> somewhere, never getting posted to the mailing lists at all.  That would
> make me sad.  

It would also be ineffective.  I already tried having a secondary review
forum for people who wanted to do reviews but not subscribe to -hackers;
it didn't work out too well.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers