Message-ID: <51154497.3000709@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 13:31:51 -0500
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8;
	rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
CC: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>,
	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs
References: <5112C602.3090109@agliodbs.com> <511513E5.10104@gmx.net>
	<16562.1360339107@sss.pgh.pa.us>
In-Reply-To: <16562.1360339107@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org

On 2/8/13 10:58 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> I suggest, build it and they will come, or not.  Let people push their
>> patches into Gerrit and attach the reviews to the commit fest items.  If
>> reviewers then want to use that, it's their choice.  We'll see how it goes.
> 
> I might be misunderstanding what you're suggesting here, but it sounds
> like this would imply that reviews could end up off in a Gerrit repo
> somewhere, never getting posted to the mailing lists at all.  That would
> make me sad.  The list archives are this project's community memory,
> and I have every expectation that they'll still be around and useful
> when Gerrit is forgotten.  I don't object to people using their
> tools-of-choice to perform reviewing, but we need some way of making
> sure that the reviews get archived.

Gerrit sends me an email every times something happens, so I think this
is not going to be a problem.

What it doesn't support AFAICT is sending emails *in*, but I don't see
that as a requirement.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers