Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U7W8T-0005Bo-6G for pgsql-pkg-debian@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:12:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U7W8S-0004Iy-KS for pgsql-pkg-debian@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:12:20 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:7903:4::125]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U7W8S-0004Iq-58; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:12:20 +0000 Received: from [2a02:16a8:dc41::11] (helo=cronos.madness.at) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U7W8Q-000202-Lv; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:12:19 +0000 Received: from mastermind.kaltenbrunner.cc ([2001:470:7a2d::22]) by cronos.madness.at with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U7W8I-0000UR-BP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:12:12 +0100 Message-ID: <51227D09.70209@kaltenbrunner.cc> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:12:09 +0100 From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Page CC: Bruce Momjian , Josh Berkus , Christoph Berg , Martin Pitt , Magnus Hagander , PostgreSQL WWW , PostgreSQL in Debian , Tom Lane Subject: Re: Re: [pgsql-www] We should not transition to apt.postgresql.org until we have a PPA References: <20130214122643.GF30046@msgid.df7cb.de> <511D2E58.6010705@agliodbs.com> <511D4E61.5050808@kaltenbrunner.cc> <20130216013854.GD12029@momjian.us> <5122719B.4090208@kaltenbrunner.cc> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a02:16a8:dc41::11 (failed) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-Mailing-List: pgsql-pkg-debian List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-pkg-debian-owner@postgresql.org On 02/18/2013 07:40 PM, Dave Page wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner > wrote: >> On 02/18/2013 10:15 AM, Dave Page wrote: >>> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: >>>> >>>> Folks, we shouldn't be requiring decoder rings here to install Postgres >>>> --- we have to do better. >>> >>> Agreed. A number of years back we did a lot of work to make it easy >>> for people to download and install PostgreSQL, through redesigns of >>> the download pages and intentionally directing less technical users to >>> the easiest ways to get up and running with everything they need to >>> get started (the one-click installers). That was redesigned a few >>> months back to point less technical users at the RPM/DEB packages >>> instead, as it was felt that with the right wording and stabilisation >>> of the package repos that could be made as easy as the installers. >>> This is a major step backwards, and needs to be fixed ASAP. >> >> I heavily disagree - while there are certainly improvements to be made I >> don't think what we have is a "major step backwards" - we now have stuff >> we did not have before, like a much larger selection of packages for a >> much larger number of distributions and like with every project we ever >> did we will have to do incremental improvements. >> >> I really really doubt that for anybody who is not able to use the >> distribution provide packages the current instructions are a problem at >> all and whatever we do the easiest way to get pg will always be the >> package that the distribution has because that one is "perfectly" >> integrated and available. > > History has proven that wasn't the case. We used to get regular emails > to webmaster@ from people who were confused about what combination of > packages they had to install because it simply wasn't clear, and like > it or not, there are a lot of people out there who are not familiar > with platform native packaging - including a significant percentage of > Oracle users for example. > >> Comparing for example the current apt.postgresql.org instructions to >> what we have for the rpm package we are imho on parity (like people >> complain about it being hard to figure out what their current OS is - >> you need to know that for rpms as well and afaik there has been no >> complaints about that). > > Seriously? This is from the download pages... Setting up yum.postgresql.org: > > 1) Choose the appropriate repo RPM from > http://yum.postgresql.org/repopackages.php > > 2) Install with a command like: > > rpm -i http://yum.postgresql.org/9.1/redhat/rhel-6-x86_64/pgdg-redhat91-9.1-5.noarch.rpm well so far so good - BUT... > > > Compared to... Setting up apt.postgresql.org: > > 1) Import the repository signing key > > wget -O - http://apt.postgresql.org/pub/repos/apt/ACCC4CF8.asc | sudo > apt-key add - > > 2) Edit the file /etc/apt/sources.list.d/pgdg.list, and add a line for > the repository, substituting the proper "codename" for your release > > deb http://apt.postgresql.org/pub/repos/apt/ squeeze-pgdg main > > 3) Configure apt's package pinning to prefer the PGDG packages over > the standard ones in /etc/apt/preferences.d/pgdg.pref > > Package: * > Pin: release o=apt.postgresql.org > Pin-Priority: 500 http://yum.postgresql.org/howtoyum.php clearly tells that the above is necessary as well on redhat if you want to override the distribution packages: -- As root, cd /etc/yum.repos.d Edit distro's .repo file: On Fedora, edit fedora.repo and fedora-updates.repo, [fedora] sections On CentOS, edit CentOS-Base.repo, [base] and [updates] sections. On Red Hat, edit edit /etc/yum/pluginconf.d/rhnplugin.conf [main] section. Add exclude=postgresql* -- so I still think they are equivalent... Stefan -- Sent via pgsql-pkg-debian mailing list (pgsql-pkg-debian@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-pkg-debian