Received: from magus.postgresql.org (magus.postgresql.org [87.238.57.229])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D3E0C83CB2
	for <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 17:15:35 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130])
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) id 1SogqJ-0003em-OF
	for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 20:15:34 +0000
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q6AKF6eZ005266;
	Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:15:07 -0400 (EDT)
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>
cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>,
	Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>,
	Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>,
	Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, w^3 <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: 9.2beta web issues
In-reply-to: <4FFC764B.4060800@kaltenbrunner.cc>
References: 
 <CABUevEybVA7dEeBUekoinBpLn40jWjhYHdhzPJj=f-p1ZYPRgg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1341525030-sup-6100@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<2405.1341528250@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4FF72D24.1010206@kaltenbrunner.cc>
	<CAEYLb_Uycpj6h1f5_1dXquk1c2XOVeSYDaPtKHHWibQbOpXD8w@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FFB67BD.90908@agliodbs.com> <4FFC6AA0.1060903@kaltenbrunner.cc>
	<4FFC6C8E.2060305@agliodbs.com>
	<1341943550-sup-2118@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<4FFC7124.3050700@agliodbs.com> <20120710182957.GB31912@momjian.us>
	<4FFC764B.4060800@kaltenbrunner.cc>
Comments: In-reply-to Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>
	message dated "Tue, 10 Jul 2012 20:36:59 +0200"
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:15:06 -0400
Message-ID: <5265.1341951306@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-Archive-Number: 201207/84
X-Sequence-Number: 20833

Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes:
> I fully agree - if we ever figure out how that "serious QA" thingy is
> going to work we can easily add a dedicated and maybe even more
> appropriately named list. refacturing a list that we have people
> subscribed to under a specific purpose into something that might be
> something entirely different "next year" seems completely wrong anyway...

+1.  Adding a mailing list is not exactly the hardest part of getting
a formal QA effort going.  Moreover, if the previous rationale for having
pgsql-testing was that it was a place where newbies could feel sheltered
while posting bug reports, how are the existing subscribers going to
relate to what Josh is now suggesting?  Repurposing this list for that
usage seems entirely inappropriate.

			regards, tom lane