X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E0139FB656 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 16:04:17 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19534-01-8 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 16:03:49 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9562F9FB6FC for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 13:28:32 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k81GSVjY005763; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 12:28:31 -0400 (EDT) To: Marc Fournier cc: pgsql-www@postgreSQL.org Subject: Mailing lists slow ... Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 12:28:30 -0400 Message-ID: <5762.1157128110@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.126 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200609/3 X-Sequence-Number: 10581 The PG mailing lists all seem to be suffering about a one-hour round trip delay today. Can anybody fix that? regards, tom lane