Received: from localhost (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C08CC9FA15F for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2007 18:14:18 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20735-05 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2007 18:14:18 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684F69F93A4 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2007 18:14:18 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.187]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03F57118B40A for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2007 18:14:14 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 40884-05; Wed, 7 Feb 2007 18:14:00 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-137-79-174.eastlink.ca [24.137.79.174]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F815118D14D; Wed, 7 Feb 2007 18:14:00 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD8147669; Wed, 7 Feb 2007 18:14:05 -0400 (AST) Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 18:14:05 -0400 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Greg Sabino Mullane , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: No checksums please Message-ID: <5A07E9FC7A72BC9C856E4872@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <63a8efc0d2de25aaefb01c33f863c89f@biglumber.com> References: <63a8efc0d2de25aaefb01c33f863c89f@biglumber.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.7 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200702/139 X-Sequence-Number: 11544 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - --On Tuesday, February 06, 2007 16:49:28 +0000 Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: RIPEMD160 > > >> I don't know if there is a difference between "duplicate detection" and >> "partial duplicate detection". AFAIK, only the "partial duplicate >> detection" has caused problems. But just ignore that ocmment if they are >> the same thing. > > Most of the moderated posts in the queue (e.g. -announce) seem to have > all three types of checksums: > > Duplicate Message-ID > Duplicate Message Checksum > Duplicate Partial Message Checksum > > It's fairly frustrating - for example, the recent post from Pavel Golub > was approved by me this morning, and a few minutes later there were > five separate messages in the queue with this message and all three > duplicate warnings on each of them. I've left them in there in case > others want to take a look. I put a check on Duplicate Message-ID in place, but left the checksum stuff turned off ... that should reduce the duplicates in the queue, but still allow stuff like the posts to slave-to-the-web through ... - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFyk8t4QvfyHIvDvMRAteoAJ0bgyTfW2IJtW4eNwSMBJwOCLf6uwCgq3rz NSlt2n4Cjeu6zpp2UcCQobo= =ULUd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----