Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDF0B64024E for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:24:17 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82797-06 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:24:11 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.28]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7BDD6402C4 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:21:22 -0300 (ADT) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 3so1767573ywj.73 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:21:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rvTJlwvaDkGSRskZybdQwgDcBo0IKyxs8eHsBzLQbI8=; b=Mi5eBBC4bQV7ArV/9LlFNyEJAKE94S+s/LF4sFB9gu1BYxZd7V92bn4PCQgt7MK9lD qbcdtp+z44nS+OFt1hCti6I5gTKe+MIoN/CbMjfo3Kdi66FdnUEwT/S2NPiAav8hJ9r5 7X7/R2X8D/4Um2J5MEiu1jboDRCRQV73MvK4I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Se15tuat8nFaitS5f5rcYVhw10ceMSMROM5tOX6UNUryaAFG0bFE1sQ2yPUn0iKANc 591a6BwO0KWIv7DqVtE7HHdR5MfIAD1BeyAj3xPjw2ZV64rbUE8iNTGkoXldRd8hKiX1 hWgrFlVLeWrW0wVGYHfRsUFTOibwTLO/kybXw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.124.6 with SMTP id w6mr8203995anc.5.1237918882310; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:21:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4136ffa0903241111r4d552600h876839b9e3b65e3c@mail.gmail.com> References: <665164.63021.qm@web28512.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <4136ffa0903241111r4d552600h876839b9e3b65e3c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:21:22 -0400 Message-ID: <603c8f070903241121l4f8b9e5v522874e342ba7b03@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Function C and INOUT parameters From: Robert Haas To: Greg Stark Cc: Ben Ali Rachid , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200903/939 X-Sequence-Number: 135617 On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Greg Stark wrote: > Personally I'm of the opinion we should eliminate most of these > duplicative mailing lists like -performance and -interfaces and just > use -general. I don't see that having multiple lists for user > questions helps either the users or the answerers due to just this > type of problem. -1. I don't read -general; I do read -performance. The S/N ratio is high enough to make it worth the time it takes; I don't think that would be true on -general. ...Robert