Received: from localhost (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C269FB44E for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:26:36 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52390-09 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:26:35 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A816E9FB442 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:26:36 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A4CF118B427 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:26:30 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59177-02; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:26:31 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-137-79-174.eastlink.ca [24.137.79.174]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF66C118B425; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:26:24 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C8E3B6AA; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:26:30 -0400 (AST) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:26:30 -0400 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Tom Lane , Magnus Hagander cc: Greg Sabino Mullane , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Problems with pgsql-announce Message-ID: <6203BE5A8CEA7B41BAC3E3D0@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <6868.1168614531@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <45A2A297.3030702@hagander.net> <2832647D5175723299FCAF1C@ganymede.hub.org> <20070112142824.GA6561@svr2.hagander.net> <6868.1168614531@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.7 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200701/55 X-Sequence-Number: 11322 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - --On Friday, January 12, 2007 10:08:51 -0500 Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander writes: >>> most of what gets 'falsely stuck' tend to be >>> subscribe/unsubscribe requests though ... if you see one that has been >>> 'spending 48 hours', please forward it to me with full headers, as something >>> else is wrong ... > >> I've definitly seen that happen and more than once. DOn't have one >> around, but I'll eb sure to collect the headers next time it happens. > > Something else I've noticed saveral times in the last week is getting a > delayed copy of something that already came through. These weren't the > usual newbie-sends-another-copy-after-subscribing deal because they came > from established subscribers. I didn't save copies but will next time. Which is why I'm hesitant to remove the duplicate checks ... Just curious though, next time you see this, if you notice it on time, could you send me the full headers? I know this will be a hard one, since I imagine the second comes through as almost a 'deja vu' kind of experience, not simultaneously, but if you get 'lucky' enough to have them both at the same time, be interseting to see the complete message with full headers to compare ... - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFp8TG4QvfyHIvDvMRAlpDAJ9brwpCOjOBDrrY8zQ+bK0F3o10EACglwVh 0RCqqNj0RUJidxLmt8mMYRg= =4fIm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----