X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E159B9DC875 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:33:45 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59493-07 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:33:46 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from tetra.ehpg.net (tetra2.ehpg.net [65.19.161.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0180D9DC86C for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:33:41 -0400 (AST) Received: from dsl081-087-203.lax1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.87.203]) by tetra.ehpg.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1Eycv0-0007yC-II; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:33:43 -0800 In-Reply-To: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE92E9D4@algol.sollentuna.se> References: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE92E9D4@algol.sollentuna.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <62399B0B-6A7E-45B6-9DE3-F586D66E0EE8@ehpg.net> Cc: "Darcy Buskermolen" , , "Joshua D. Drake" , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Gavin M. Roy" Subject: Re: [Gforge-admins] PgFoundry Move Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:33:41 -0800 To: "Magnus Hagander" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.044 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.044] X-Spam-Score: 0.044 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200601/159 X-Sequence-Number: 9347 On Jan 16, 2006, at 2:25 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> 80% of the Gforge admins are Linux guys afaik, which is why >> we need more FreeBSD help. > > You're probably going to see that split for anything where you compare > linux with freebsd today, aren't you? Or at least on average. I agree with that. > Yes, backup is definitly more important than failover. But failover is > nice :-) > But in reality, do we have it? As in failover that works in > practice as > well. Just look at what happened when there was an attempt to move > svr2 > (wwwmaster) off unionfs to a new VM *on the same machine*. > It's very good in principle. I'm sure in a lot of cases it works in > practice as well. I'm concerned it doesn't always, and that we are > very > relying on certain people to make it work in that case. Failover is nice, but I don't agree that VM's are the best wait to handle fail over. > I'd say trivial. Just poll the ppl who'd be expected to admin it for > preferences, and decide on one. Then stick with it as much as you can > :-) There is absolutely no need to do a general poll of the whol > community, since that's definitly going to give you more than you want > :-) Yeah I just meant on GForge Admins or the current list of community server admins. > Everything else does not run FreeBSD. All www.postgresql.org servers > except borg (there are 5 in total, IIRC) run Linux today. AFAIK, > archives and search also run on linux. (And on a mix of distros, which > is probably not ideal) Except borg? wow. And here I am a linux guy donating the only FBSD box. ;-) Gavin