Received: from makus.postgresql.org (makus.postgresql.org [98.129.198.125]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B38AEF765A for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:58:05 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SI6UF-0000ft-Pm for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 22:58:05 +0000 Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.151.188]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E99CAE97116 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:57:49 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.151.188]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 56169-04; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 22:57:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (24-246-4-43.cable.teksavvy.com [24.246.4.43]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E64BFE97114; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:57:42 -0300 (ADT) Subject: Re: Archives policy Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_EAACFA99-960D-49DB-AB7D-5C3788682B6C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 From: Marc Fournier In-Reply-To: <1334170360-sup-2843@alvh.no-ip.org> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:57:40 -0400 Cc: Joshua D. Drake , Tom Lane , Dave Page , Bruce Momjian , w^3 Message-Id: <62EA3316-2F6F-4524-B55F-F3EFE1639FA6@hub.org> References: <16454.1239890476@sss.pgh.pa.us> <200904161454.n3GEsxm27869@momjian.us> <937d27e10904160808w21a2ebbcs57136807df000680@mail.gmail.com> <20090416151427.GW7709@alvh.no-ip.org> <937d27e10904160827r19c50f2fg79a552fdaae96836@mail.gmail.com> <20090416135324.U84471@hub.org> <20090416165800.GY7709@alvh.no-ip.org> <20090416155223.N84471@hub.org> <27966.1239908638@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1239908879.7840.294.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org> <1334170360-sup-2843@alvh.no-ip.org> To: Alvaro Herrera X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 tagged_above=-5 required=4.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Archive-Number: 201204/17 X-Sequence-Number: 20591 --Apple-Mail=_EAACFA99-960D-49DB-AB7D-5C3788682B6C Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 On 2012-04-11, at 2:55 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >=20 > Excerpts from Joshua D. Drake's message of jue abr 16 15:07:59 -0400 = 2009: >> On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 15:03 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>> "Marc G. Fournier" writes: >>>> On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >>>>> (and I don't think we're going to attempt to delete pornographic >>>>> messages posted months ago -- if anything of the sort happens, = action is >>>>> going to be taken pretty hastily). >>>=20 >>>> Agreed ... there isn't any reason why someone 'internally' doesn't = notice=20 >>>> it from jus scanning the lists ... >>>=20 >>> I think by far the most likely problem scenario is that someone = claims >>> to hold copyright on something-or-other in an old message and files = a >>> DMCA takedown notice against it. AFAICT the standard of proof in = such >>> cases is "guilty until proven innocent", so we'd probably have to = cave >>> rather than argue about it. How are the copyright laws in Canada = these >>> days? >>=20 >> I think what we really need to do is stop playing attorney and ask = one >> what our exposure is. I will contact SFLC. >=20 > I just got another guy requesting me to remove an archived email from > very old archives. Nothing illegal so I'm not doing it. Still, I = just > reread this thread and saw this offer and no followup. JD, did you = ever > get around to asking SFLC about this? Iin the past, the policy was defined nice and simple: once in the = archives, there are no changes, period, since its not just our archives = that the messages is in, but every public / private archive that exists = on the Internet =85 The one exception to this was a few years back when we were alerts that = there was a bunch of porn, but we didn't *remove* the posts, onlly = XXXX'd out the text, so that the archives URLs didn't get changed in the = process =85 As for 'copyright laws in Canada', which was asked also above =85 = consider Canada, in large part, to be a sister-state to the US, if not a = bit more fascist(god, hope that is the right word) =85 it fluctuates = somewhat, but over time, the net result tends to be that what is adopted = in the US, gets adopted here =85 --Apple-Mail=_EAACFA99-960D-49DB-AB7D-5C3788682B6C Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAk+GDGUACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvPSpQCgiCp7VabBsuHmIbVLlW//MV7C MMkAnR1hajUmepWnxyESJ+pZ9zCkx4ow =iYrg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_EAACFA99-960D-49DB-AB7D-5C3788682B6C--