Received: from localhost (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B40E99FB396 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:20:07 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12092-07 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:20:03 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D05B9FB35D for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:20:07 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.191]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0900118DDA0 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:20:02 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 77748-10; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:20:01 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-137-79-174.eastlink.ca [24.137.79.174]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4095118B40A; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:19:57 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2165C0CD; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:19:54 -0400 (AST) Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:19:54 -0400 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Bruce Momjian , Andrew Sullivan cc: PostgreSQL www Subject: Re: Email issues unanswered Message-ID: <64196BA371E746FF3C0DCF47@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <200701292311.l0TNBcg09471@momjian.us> References: <200701292311.l0TNBcg09471@momjian.us> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.7 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200701/119 X-Sequence-Number: 11386 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - --On Monday, January 29, 2007 18:11:38 -0500 Bruce Momjian wrote: > My long subject email going out looks like: > > From bruce Fri Jan 26 21:00:37 2007 > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL > branches Looks like something has add a carriage return at the end of PostgreSQL, which breaks the RFC ... if it was all one line (as per the RFC quote that Andrew sent), it wouldn't have gone through (as per the valid long Subject that I just sent to you) ... You are talking about 'multi line' (against RFCs) vs 'long subjects that wrap' (not against RFCs) ... - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFvoEa4QvfyHIvDvMRArj8AJwMz1g5HHverBOKhDCJvfit2htVdQCcDrQx Crh1VulXUAfF0A9t6zw0VVI= =tTPx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----