Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h4SGJ-00063q-Cb for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 15:27:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h4SGI-0004m6-1p for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 15:27:14 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h4SGH-0004jQ-Rb for pgsql-www@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 15:27:13 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h4SGF-00032O-7n for pgsql-www@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 15:27:13 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x2EFR3wi006671; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 11:27:03 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Magnus Hagander cc: Stefan Kaltenbrunner , PostgreSQL WWW Subject: Re: Namespace projects.postgresql.org In-reply-to: References: <18940.1551545018@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Magnus Hagander message dated "Thu, 14 Mar 2019 15:50:36 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-ID: <6669.1552577223.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 11:27:03 -0400 Message-ID: <6670.1552577223@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Magnus Hagander writes: > I have now removed the projects.postgresql.org entry from DNS. > I haven't done anything to the FTP entries, since they are as mentioned > quite possibly the only copy of some of this stuff. > Perhaps we should drop a README file ínto the pub/projects directory > explaining that content in these directories can be expected to be out of > date? It won't help people following deep links into it, but at least it > might do something? +1 regards, tom lane