Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UCXdl-0001em-BS for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:49:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UCXdk-0002EP-LK for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:49:24 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UCXdj-0002EH-Hu for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:49:23 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UCXdd-000307-Bp for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:49:23 +0000 Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r24Fmxvi006928; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 10:49:00 -0500 (EST) From: Tom Lane To: Magnus Hagander cc: Alvaro Herrera , Andres Freund , Kevin Grittner , Peter Eisentraut , PostgreSQL WWW , Stephen Frost Subject: Re: gitweb is no longer a real-time view In-reply-to: References: <20130304020324.GE16142@tamriel.snowman.net> <2480.1362363162@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20130304023335.GH16142@tamriel.snowman.net> <20130304125013.GB3943@awork2.anarazel.de> <20130304143349.GX9507@alvh.no-ip.org> <20130304143852.GH3943@awork2.anarazel.de> <20130304145842.GZ9507@alvh.no-ip.org> <20130304150344.GK3943@awork2.anarazel.de> <20130304151127.GB9507@alvh.no-ip.org> <5564.1362410250@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Magnus Hagander message dated "Mon, 04 Mar 2013 16:31:15 +0100" Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 10:48:59 -0500 Message-ID: <6927.1362412139@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-www Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org Magnus Hagander writes: > Ok, both repos *should* now be where they are supposed to be, per this > discussion. Being a paranoid sort, I'm doing a full new "git clone" to compare to my old repo. But assuming that that's okay, what instructions do you want to give committers about recovering? There should be a followup with that info to the pgsql-hackers message you posted. The other todo item was updating the wiki's instructions for committers. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www