X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE1D63A3EC8; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 09:10:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30002-01; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 09:10:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx-2.sollentuna.net (mx-2.sollentuna.net [195.84.163.199]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC64F3A426C; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 09:10:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ALGOL.sollentuna.se (janus.sollentuna.se [62.65.68.67]) by mx-2.sollentuna.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663A48F52D; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:10:38 +0100 (CET) content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Subject: Re: Alternate PostgreSQL.org Design Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:10:37 +0100 Message-ID: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE456A4E@algol.sollentuna.se> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Alternate PostgreSQL.org Design Thread-Index: AcTIklG0waWKZaT4RUWFqGgc09R7qAABHgRA From: "Magnus Hagander" To: "Omar Kilani" , , X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200411/144 X-Sequence-Number: 5875 > Hi Again, >=20 > We would like to put forward an alternate design to the=20 > current wwwdevel design. >=20 > It is available at: http://postgresql.tinysofa.com/ >=20 > We believe that it is clean, professional and simple. And it=20 > makes the release of 8.0 actually... exciting. :) >=20 > It is a *drop-in* replacement for the current pgweb design.=20 > No additional work is required to retrofit the current=20 > wwwdevel design.=20 > It's already done! Not quite. My pet-peeve is back :-) I managed to get Alexey to change About to Overview. It just seems very weird to find things like "Interfacing postgresql with other software" under "About". Just my opinion of course, and since things seem to drop back into About now and then, perhaps I'm the only one with it. > It validates. It is designed for 800x600 and up. And it looks=20 > pretty. :) It indeed looks very good. But is there any reason why it can't be made to use the full width of a browser window if it's large? It seems to just center in the browser now... > Of course, we're willing to help out with the content if our=20 > design is used. :) Only with that design? :P I'm sure there are a lot of help needed with content regardless of design, and since content and design aren't locked together... //Magnus