X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D746FD9F8E for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 03:58:17 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 92162-10 for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 06:58:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx-2.sollentuna.net (mx-2.sollentuna.net [195.84.163.199]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0142DD9ED6 for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 03:58:12 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ALGOL.sollentuna.se (janus.sollentuna.se [62.65.68.67]) by mx-2.sollentuna.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C291B8F28A; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 08:58:11 +0200 (CEST) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Subject: Re: Ads dont connect Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 08:58:11 +0200 Message-ID: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE6C7A4A@algol.sollentuna.se> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Ads dont connect Thread-Index: AcXIiLDfi+XD93dGRHG6APNlrpQaoAAJyUGw From: "Magnus Hagander" To: "Greg Sabino Mullane" , X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.061 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.011, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05] X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200510/4 X-Sequence-Number: 8592 > >> Although ads.postgresql.org could in theory also track the=20 > IPs that=20 > >> they send the image too and try and match that way if the=20 > cookie was=20 > >> not found. That should fix it 99% of the time, I would think. > =20 > > Except then it has to save the IPs for every hit to every page *in=20 > > case* someone happens to click through ... > =20 > But aren't they already saved in the apache logs? It would be=20 > expensive to parse them, true, but this would be a rare case=20 > for those who are not accepting cookies. Or at the very=20 > least, what if the non-mirror site (e.g. www.postgresql.org)=20 > used a slightly different system that did not rely on the=20 > cookie/image scheme? Can't talk about the ads.pg server, but al the static servers have logging turned off to handle the performance requirements. And what do you mean with the "non-mirror site www.postgresql.org"? www.postgresql.org is the mirrored site ;-) //Magnus