X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF7FD7B8B; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 11:39:07 -0400 (AST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52805-03; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 15:39:09 +0000 (GMT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from mx-2.sollentuna.net (mx-2.sollentuna.net [195.84.163.199]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1C8DB94C; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 11:39:02 -0400 (AST) Received: from ALGOL.sollentuna.se (janus.sollentuna.se [62.65.68.67]) by mx-2.sollentuna.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 636288F28C; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 16:39:06 +0100 (CET) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Help speeding up delete Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 16:39:06 +0100 Message-ID: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE6C7C03@algol.sollentuna.se> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] [PERFORM] Help speeding up delete thread-index: AcXriFF+MaR09uvOR3ivzN3N2SRPNQABHMjA From: "Magnus Hagander" To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" Cc: "Simon Riggs" , , "Tom Lane" , "Steve Wampler" , "Postgres-performance" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000] X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200511/114 X-Sequence-Number: 8829 > >>That way if someone wanted to upgrade from 7.2 to 8.1, they=20 > can just=20 > >>grab the latest dumper from the website, dump their old=20 > database, then=20 > >>upgrade easily. > >=20 > > But if they're upgrading to 8.1, don't they already have the new=20 > > pg_dump? How else are they going to dump their *new* database? >=20 > Erm. Usually when you install the new package/port for 8.1,=20 > you cannot have both new and old installed at the same time=20 > man. Remember they both store exactly the same binary files=20 > in exactly the same place. Urrk. Didn't think of that. I always install from source on Unix, which doesn't have the problem. And the Windows port doesn't have this problem - it will put the binaries in a version dependant directory. One could claim the packages are broken ;-), but that's not gonig to help here, I know... (I always install in pgsql-, and then symlink pgsql there..) > >>etc. (Seriously.) In fact, few realise at all that they should use=20 > >>the 8.1 dumper. > >=20 > > That most people don't know they should use the new one I=20 > understand=20 > > though. But I don't see how this will help against that :-) >=20 > It'll make it easy... You assume they know enough to download it. If they don't know to look for it, they still won't find it. But the bottom line: I can see how it would be helpful if you're on a distro which packages postgresql in a way that prevents you from installing more than one version at the same time. //Magnus