X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C54D9DD448; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:29:36 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24051-04-3; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:29:39 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from mx-2.sollentuna.net (mx-2.sollentuna.net [195.84.163.199]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9273B9DCCC6; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:28:22 -0400 (AST) Received: from ALGOL.sollentuna.se (janus.sollentuna.se [62.65.68.67]) by mx-2.sollentuna.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0AB98F292; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:28:25 +0100 (CET) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Subject: Re: Change in policy on News? Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:28:25 +0100 Message-ID: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE6C7E4F@algol.sollentuna.se> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Change in policy on News? Thread-Index: AcYVXmhc8l1ImeJTRfqzmycFIDFL8AAiyjyw From: "Magnus Hagander" To: "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: "Josh Berkus" , X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.079 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.079] X-Spam-Score: 0.079 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200601/48 X-Sequence-Number: 9236 > >>> I'd love this, but it would require a site design change. If you=20 > >>> remember, we'd talked about dividing the news tickers into > >> 4 parts: News, Product > >>> Announcements, Events and Training. However, that didn't > >> work with the > >>> design for the home page. > >> > >> How much work would it be to fix up the right column on=20 > the main page? > >> > >> Initial thoughts: > >> > >> Get rid of the individual dates ... change it to something like: > > > > I think that's a really bad idea, for two reasons: > > 1) It's good to know the exact date, when you're a frequent browser >=20 > If you are a frequent browser, you would know what's changed=20 > sicne the last time you visited ... and if you are interested=20 > in a headline, you would click on it to read the whole thing,=20 > and get teh exact date at the same time ... Well, I know *I* get annoyed when I hit sites that listn ews without dates on them ;-) > > 2) We more or less *have* to keep up the throughput. And the list=20 > > isn't "dynamic" enough - once the first entry goes in for=20 > february, it=20 > > gets to live alone.. >=20 > I was more thinking '6 most recent headlines', and if they=20 > overlap months, so be it, you have: >=20 > News > Jan 2006 > ... > ... > Dec 2006 > ... > ... > ... > ... >=20 > Or do you mean we *want* to get rid of Dec News when the=20 > first one for Jan comes along? Absolutely not. I thought you meant "show two months" or so. If we still show headlines, I can live with it. Though I still prefer the full dates. //Magnus