public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Runaway zope on svr2?
5+ messages / 4 participants
[nested] [flat]

* Runaway zope on svr2?
@ 2005-10-31 19:10 Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
  2005-10-31 19:50 ` Re: Runaway zope on svr2? Robert Bernier <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread

From: Magnus Hagander @ 2005-10-31 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-www

There is a zope process running there at about 90% CPU usage, which
appears to have been pegged there for quite a whlie - it's used up 7500
hours of CPU time since Oct 24th. Somebody who knows about that one
mshould probably look into that one ASAP :-)

It's used for techdocsl, but it certainly shouldn't look like that...

//Magnus




^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Runaway zope on svr2?
  2005-10-31 19:10 Runaway zope on svr2? Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
@ 2005-10-31 19:50 ` Robert Bernier <[email protected]>
  2005-11-01 04:31   ` Re: Runaway zope on svr2? Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread

From: Robert Bernier @ 2005-10-31 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-www

On Monday 31 October 2005 14:10, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> There is a zope process running there at about 90% CPU usage, which
> appears to have been pegged there for quite a whlie - it's used up 7500
> hours of CPU time since Oct 24th. Somebody who knows about that one
> mshould probably look into that one ASAP :-)
>
> It's used for techdocsl, but it certainly shouldn't look like that...
>

I think I have this wrong but wasn't there a php exploit recently reported that affected zope? Can somebody clarify this?

cheers

Robert



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Runaway zope on svr2?
  2005-10-31 19:10 Runaway zope on svr2? Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
  2005-10-31 19:50 ` Re: Runaway zope on svr2? Robert Bernier <[email protected]>
@ 2005-11-01 04:31   ` Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread

From: Marc G. Fournier @ 2005-11-01 04:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Robert Bernier <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www

On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Robert Bernier wrote:

> On Monday 31 October 2005 14:10, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> There is a zope process running there at about 90% CPU usage, which
>> appears to have been pegged there for quite a whlie - it's used up 7500
>> hours of CPU time since Oct 24th. Somebody who knows about that one
>> mshould probably look into that one ASAP :-)
>>
>> It's used for techdocsl, but it certainly shouldn't look like that...
>>
>
> I think I have this wrong but wasn't there a php exploit recently 
> reported that affected zope? Can somebody clarify this?

Details ... you do know that Zope is Python, not PHP, right?  I'd *really* 
love to see that exploit though :)

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [email protected]           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664




^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Runaway zope on svr2?
@ 2005-10-31 19:19 Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
  2005-10-31 20:31 ` Re: Runaway zope on svr2? Tino Wildenhain <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread

From: Magnus Hagander @ 2005-10-31 19:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-www

Got it restarted, but we should probalby keep an extra eye on it.
 
//Magnus

> 
> There is a zope process running there at about 90% CPU usage, 
> which appears to have been pegged there for quite a whlie - 
> it's used up 7500 hours of CPU time since Oct 24th. Somebody 
> who knows about that one mshould probably look into that one ASAP :-)
> 
> It's used for techdocsl, but it certainly shouldn't look like that...
> 
> //Magnus
> 
> 



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Runaway zope on svr2?
  2005-10-31 19:19 Re: Runaway zope on svr2? Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
@ 2005-10-31 20:31 ` Tino Wildenhain <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread

From: Tino Wildenhain @ 2005-10-31 20:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www

Am Montag, den 31.10.2005, 20:19 +0100 schrieb Magnus Hagander:
> Got it restarted, but we should probalby keep an extra eye on it.

Which version? Need help?

Greets
Tino





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 5+ messages in thread


end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-01 04:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-10-31 19:10 Runaway zope on svr2? Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
2005-10-31 19:50 ` Robert Bernier <[email protected]>
2005-11-01 04:31   ` Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
2005-10-31 19:19 Re: Runaway zope on svr2? Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
2005-10-31 20:31 ` Tino Wildenhain <[email protected]>

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox