Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: Case study: Proximity
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:29:52 +0100
Message-ID: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE92E8C5@algol.sollentuna.se>
Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Case study: Proximity
thread-index: AcX1K7vTmixlxJK/TdGMI9sNgqHeVAAADIXQ
From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>
To: "Robert Treat" <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>,
	"Gavin Sherry" <swm@alcove.com.au>
Cc: <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>

> > > "We consider the availability of source code a major advantage of=20
> > > using an open source database. We haven't had to go a fix=20
> any bugs=20
> > > ourselves, but we have peered at  the source to satisfy=20
> ourselves as=20
> > > to how things work"  -- Tim Allen, Senior Software=20
> Developer, Proximity Group.
> > >
> >=20
> > There are other good quotes:
> >=20
> > "Our systems are deployed in high-availability environments and the=20
> > combination of PostgreSQL on Linux has enabled us to deploy and=20
> > support systems without any need for a large support team."
> >=20
>=20
> Yeah, how do we feel about multiple quotes from the same person?

I see no problem in general with it. Assuming we have "enough" quotes in
general that is - so we get a reasonable rotation in respect to person
as well as quote.

//Magnus