X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393729DC814; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 17:05:28 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 34147-10; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 17:05:25 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from mx-2.sollentuna.net (mx-2.sollentuna.net [195.84.163.199]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C1789DC881; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 17:05:19 -0400 (AST) Received: from ALGOL.sollentuna.se (janus.sollentuna.se [62.65.68.67]) by mx-2.sollentuna.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B868F283; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 22:05:20 +0100 (CET) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Subject: Re: PgFoundry Move Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 22:05:19 +0100 Message-ID: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE92E9D3@algol.sollentuna.se> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] PgFoundry Move Thread-Index: AcYa3B8X9P99OTE+STyuy1G9xmw+wQAAvAsw From: "Magnus Hagander" To: "Marc G. Fournier" , "David Fetter" Cc: "Joshua D. Drake" , , X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.086 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.086] X-Spam-Score: 0.086 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200601/150 X-Sequence-Number: 9338 > My one criteria in all of this, from day one, was that it had=20 > to be FreeBSD based, it has to be redundant with our current=20 > *core* infrastructure ... While this is a very good point, I don't think it should be overstressed. Yes, it's very good to have that type of redundancy. But if it can be built on a different level than the OS, that would be even better. And it *is* a bit of a problem that there are a lot less ppl skilled in FreeBSD. I know personally of several cases where things have been notably delayed because nobody around really *knew* FreeBSD, specifically with jails, good enough. Yes, a lot of things are the same because it's still *nix. And for critical stuff, I know we can page you. And usually, I assume that results in quick action (don't think I've ever had to, really). But at least I don't want to wake you up in the middle of the night for something that's not that urgent. Now, I'm not saying we should necessariliy change anything. I am just saying that this difference in "available knowledge" is something that whould be weighed into discussions like these. //Magnus