X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F1209DC809 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 13:49:08 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24114-09 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 13:49:07 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from mx-2.sollentuna.net (mx-2.sollentuna.net [195.84.163.199]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E00559DCB53 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 13:49:05 -0400 (AST) Received: from ALGOL.sollentuna.se (janus.sollentuna.se [62.65.68.67]) by mx-2.sollentuna.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 125468F283; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 18:49:05 +0100 (CET) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Subject: Re: human validation on post comments Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 18:49:07 +0100 Message-ID: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0F899@algol.sollentuna.se> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] human validation on post comments Thread-Index: AcZNDYk2YZdbh+B1QKSeh1t+66WXFAAAh7SA From: "Magnus Hagander" To: "Greg Sabino Mullane" , X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.103 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.103] X-Spam-Score: 0.103 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200603/127 X-Sequence-Number: 9717 > Pardon if this has already been brought up as I am late to=20 > the thread, but why can't we just use a "unseen by default"=20 > policy in which all posts are not made viewable until=20 > approved by a moderator? We already do this, and have done for a while (before that they used to be show-by-default, but can be rejected, which missed a lot). This is AFAIK about making life for the moderators easie r:-) //Magnus