X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 197839DD44C; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 15:13:54 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 69578-07; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 15:13:54 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from mx-2.sollentuna.net (mx-2.sollentuna.net [195.84.163.199]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDD6D9DD444; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 15:13:51 -0400 (AST) Received: from ALGOL.sollentuna.se (janus.sollentuna.se [62.65.68.67]) by mx-2.sollentuna.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDFD88F282; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 21:13:51 +0200 (CEST) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Subject: Re: Bittorrent (Was: RE: [HACKERS] [SUGGESTION] CVSync ) Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 21:13:51 +0200 Message-ID: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0F8A6@algol.sollentuna.se> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Bittorrent (Was: RE: [HACKERS] [SUGGESTION] CVSync ) Thread-Index: AcZRB1X2CIXOkRc7TpafqnnCDqDK4gAAFVag From: "Magnus Hagander" To: "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.104 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.104] X-Spam-Score: 0.104 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200603/149 X-Sequence-Number: 9739 [moved to -www] > Does anyone here know how to use the latest version of=20 > Bittorrent, from a server vs client, perspective? The one we=20 > are currently running is *ancient*, and I'd like to get that=20 > vServer upgraded and off the templates, but without someone=20 > that knows how to setup the newer bittorrent, well, that's=20 > just a scary proposition ;( Ancient is a bit strong - it's about a year old. By that definition, there's a whole lot of things that are a lot worse off on our servers. That said, it's not good. But the fact that something changed on the box that caused it to stop working in the past couple of days can't be because of the version, since we've been running that version for a year. Moving on, some figures: In the active log now, we have about 4 million FTP downloads and 190,000 bittorrent downloads. Meaning bittorrent is only ~ 5% of our downloads. OTOH 190,000 downloads since Jan 11th, 2005 is still more than 400 downloads per day... But the bottom line of that reasoning is, how much time do we want to spend hacking around the bittorrent stuff? We're better off now than before we had an automated system, but is it really something the end user wants. (For example, we don't know how many of those hits are hits by search engines and mirroring scripts - that could easily be a couple of hundreds aday..) As for migrating it to a differnt vserver - just make sure you have a "close enough" version of python, and it should be no problem to just tar up the whole directory and move it over. I wouldn't be particularly worried about that part. //Magnus