X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56AD311F6284; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:40:55 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21590-01; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:40:44 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from mx-2.sollentuna.net (mx-2.sollentuna.net [195.84.163.199]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1077C11F6280; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:40:42 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ALGOL.sollentuna.se (janus.sollentuna.se [62.65.68.67]) by mx-2.sollentuna.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4727D8F287; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:40:41 +0200 (CEST) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Subject: Re: mailing list moderation of subscriptions Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:40:41 +0200 Message-ID: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0F93E@algol.sollentuna.se> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] mailing list moderation of subscriptions Thread-Index: AcZonpA1Bq1KQ1aWSLu5Pt1/5ckDcwAARsGg From: "Magnus Hagander" To: "Marc G. Fournier" , "Kris Jurka" Cc: "Bruce Momjian" , X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200604/176 X-Sequence-Number: 9952 > > I guess my question is why do we have a confirmation at=20 > all? If someone=20 > > else tries to subscribe me then I have a small window where=20 > I can reject=20 > > it, but otherwise it will be approved by a moderator? >=20 > My big worry is ppl slipping through the cracks due to=20 > anti-spam filters=20 > ... but, you do bring up a good point, why bother with the=20 > confirmation in=20 > the first place ... >=20 > Anyone else have comments on this? It kinda breaks down into=20 > two paths: >=20 > 1. remove 'confirmation / followup' email to subscribe > 2. have moderators just ignore "admin requests" 1 is, IMHO, a really bad idea. Unverified mailinglist subscription is *horrible*. It usde to be the norm, and people changed to the confirmation version to fix the problems. Let's not go back. If people subscribe, and miss the response, they will notice and likely go through their spambox. //Magnus